BHR Community Dermatology Service

A Contract Award Notice
by NHS NORTH EAST LONDON INTEGRATED CARE BOARD

Source
Find a Tender
Type
Contract (Services)
Duration
not specified
Value
£2M
Sector
HEALTH
Published
16 Aug 2024
Delivery
not specified
Deadline
n/a

Concepts

Location

Geochart for 1 buyers and 1 suppliers

Description

Level 3 Community Dermatology service offers advice and guidance, first appointment, follow up and treatment for minor surgery.

Total Quantity or Scope

Level 3 Community Dermatology service that offers advice and guidance, first appointment, follow up and treatment for minor surgery. The ICB intends to award this contract to the current provider DMC following the direct award C route. The contract has an estimated value of £1.9m (cost and volume).

Award Detail

1 DMC Healthcare (London)
  • Reference: 026124-2024-1
  • Value: £1,900,000

Award Criteria

The existing provider is satisfying the original contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard 100
price 0

CPV Codes

  • 85121282 - Dermatology services

Other Information

** PREVIEW NOTICE, please check Find a Tender for full details. ** This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by 29th Aug 2024. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR. Decision Makers: The award decision makers are: Director of Planned Care, Deputy Director of Planned Care, Contracts Manager and Senior Transformation Manager All policies and documents provided by NHC as part of the due diligence was reviewed by the following team members and agreed that the documentation was acceptable for the PSR- direct award C. Contracts Manager, Head of Finance, Senior Transformation Manager and Quality Rep COIs No conflicts of interest were identified Relative importance of the key criteria The following key criteria was applied in the assessment of the provider: a- Quality and Innovation (Weighting 20%), b- Value (20%) c- Integration , Collaboration and Service Sustainability (Weighting 20%), d- Improving Access, Reducing Health inequalities and Facilitating Choice (weighting 20%), e- Social Value (weighting 20%) Rationale for the relative importance of key criteria: All aspects were determined to be equally important and therefore allocated same weighting of 20%. Rationale for choosing the provider: The provider was assessed both for their current performance and potential future performance and scored overall 80% providing evaluator with confidence in their ability to meet the requirements of future contract. In addition to the key criteria, the basic selection criteria used was as below (Pass/ Fail) and the provider 'passed' across all areas: -The provider's suitability to pursue a particular activity. - The provider's economic and financial standing.

Reference

Domains