RCH512 Void Property Clearance & Cleaning
A Contract Award Notice
by RIVER CLYDE HOMES
- Source
- Find a Tender
- Type
- Contract (Services)
- Duration
- 1 year (est.)
- Value
- £473K-£892K
- Sector
- FACILITY
- Published
- 08 Mar 2021
- Delivery
- To 12 Mar 2022 (est.)
- Deadline
- n/a
Concepts
Location
Greenock
2 buyers
- River Clyde Homes Greenock
1 supplier
- Greenerleaf Estate Maintenance Coatbridge
Description
River Clyde Homes are seeking to employ a suitably experienced and competent company to undertake Void Property House clearances and ad-hoc cleaning works for properties under our control.
Total Quantity or Scope
River Clyde Homes (RCH) is a ‘not for profit’ affordable housing provider that owns and manages over 5,800 homes and provides factoring services to a further 2,200 homes in the Inverclyde area. We hold the Investors in People Gold standard and employ over 320 members of staff. RCH are seeking to employ a suitably experienced and competent company to undertake Void Property House clearances and ad-hoc cleaning works for properties under our control. The scope of the works will include, but is not limited to: - Void Property House Clearances (required to be complete within 24 hours of instruction); - Standard Cleans; - Deep Cleans; - Trauma Cleaning; - Sharps Removal; - Graffiti Removal; - Removal of Fly Tipping; - Common Area & Garden Cleans
Award Detail
1 | Greenerleaf Estate Maintenance (Coatbridge)
|
Award Criteria
Quality | 60.0 |
PRICE | 40.0 |
CPV Codes
- 90910000 - Cleaning services
- 90900000 - Cleaning and sanitation services
- 90919000 - Office, school and office equipment cleaning services
Indicators
- Award on basis of price.
Other Information
Economic operators may be excluded from this competition if they are in any of the situations referred to in regulation 58 of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015. All ESPD's must be submitted electronically via the Public Contracts Scotland (PCS) Electronic Tender Post Box. Any response not submitted via the Post Box will not be considered. Any queries relating to the contract must be raised via the 'Question & Answer' function of the PCS website. The response provided to questions 4C1 – 4C9 of the ESPD will be allocated a score based on the following methodology, all other sections of the ESPD are scored on a Pass/Fail basis: 0 - Unacceptable 1 - Poor 2 - Acceptable 3 - Good 4 - Excellent Unacceptable - Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate previous experience/capacity/capability relevant to this criterion. Poor - Response is partially relevant but generally poor. The response shows some elements of relevance to the criterion but contains insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate previous relevant experience/ capacity/capability. Acceptable - Response is relevant and acceptable. The response demonstrates broad previous experience, knowledge and skills/capacity/capability but may lack in some aspects of similarity e.g. previous experience, knowledge or skills may not be of a similar nature. Good - Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good amount of experience, knowledge or skills/capacity/capability relevant to providing similar services to similar clients. Excellent - Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates thorough experience, knowledge or skills/capacity/capability relevant to providing similar services to similar clients. Where a bidder is allocated a score of ‘0’ or 1’ by RCH’s evaluation panel, for any of these questions, they may be disqualified from the procurement process. A separate ESPD response must be provided for any subcontractor(s) on whose capability and capacity the main bidder relies on in order to meet the selection criteria. An 'ESPD Completion Guidance' document is attached to the notice. All bidders should ensure that they read and understand this document before completing the ESPD. Tenderers are strongly urged to obtain their own independent legal advice in relation to any TUPE implications (SC Ref:646761)
Reference
- FTS 004589-2021