GBC-Sustainable Travel Initiative for A3 Guildford area

Concepts

• guildford
• environmental impact assessment (EIA)
• gbc-sustainable travel initiative
• guildford area
• provision of a sustainable active travel network
• veat notice
• part of a package of measures
• estimated contract value
• council's knowledge
• previous contract

Location

Surrey, East and West Sussex: A3 area of Guildford

Description

This is not an opportunity but a VEAT notice to publish the intent to enter into a contract for an experienced local supplier for the provision of a sustainable active travel network. The opportunity was published via Contracts Finder but the Council did not reasonably foresee the estimated contract value exceeding the PCR threshold for services based on the Council's knowledge, experience and contract value from a previous contract for similar services. As such the Council are publishing a VEAT notice on the ground of ineffectiveness in accordance with PCR Regulation 99(1)(2) under Part 2(6)(7).

Total Quantity or Scope

The Contract is for the provision of a sustainable active travel network focused on supporting organisations whose employees travel to work on the A3 as it passes through Guildford, Surrey. This is part of a package of measures to improve air quality, called the Electric Towns and Cities Initiative.

Award Detail

Award Criteria

CPV Codes

• 90711400 - Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) services other than for construction

Legal Justification

The Council are publishing a VEAT notice to confirm that the procedure is deemed to be ineffective in accordance with PCR regulation 99(1)(2) under Part 2 6(7) as the Council did not reasonably foresee that the estimated contract value would exceed the PCR Threshold for services at the time of publication.

Other Information

** PREVIEW NOTICE, please check Find a Tender for full details. ** The Council are publishing a VEAT notice to confirm that the procedure is deemed to be ineffective in accordance with PCR Regulation 99(1)(2) under Part 2 (6)(7) as the Council did not reasonably foresee that the estimated contract value would exceed the PCR Threshold for services at the time of publication based on the Council's knowledge, experience and contract value from a previous contract for similar services.