Pre-Transfer Clinical Discussion & Assessment Service (PTCDA) Home Visiting Service

Concepts

• health and social work
• leicester
• assessment service
• -transfer clinical discussion
• home visits
• ptcda
• pre-transfer clinical discussion & assessment service
• the pre-transfer clinical discussion and assessment (ptcda) home visiting
• home
• clinical

Location

Leicester Leicestershire and Rutland

Description

The Contract is for the GP visiting element of the Pre-Transfer Clinical Discussion and Assessment (PTCDA) Home Visiting service. This is a multi-agency approach to improving care in the community and reducing avoidable conveyances and admissions to secondary care, which involves primary care, EMAS and secondary care geriatricians. This contract covers one element of the service, namely the Charnwood GP Network. This provides GPs to undertake home visits for patients referred by the UHL Consultant Geriatrician or Geriatric Emergency Doctor following contact from EMAS.

Total Quantity or Scope

This contract covers one element of the service, namely the Charnwood GP Network provides GPs to undertake home visits for patients referred by the UHL Consultant Geriatrician or Geriatric Emergency Doctor following contact from EMAS. LLR ICB are intending to award a contract to an existing provider following PSR direct award process C. The whole lifetime value of the contract is £380000.00 for the contract length period of 12 months from 1st April 2024 to 31st March 2025.

Award Detail

Award Criteria

CPV Codes

• 85000000 - Health and social work services

Indicators

• Award on basis of price and quality.

Legal Justification

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 15th February 2024. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.

Other Information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. The Services to which this Advertisement relates fall within the scope of Schedule 1 of the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. As such this contract notice is being published in accordance with the Provider Selection Regime Regulations as described within schedules 2-14. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by 15th February 2024, and should be submitted in writing to raj.sandhu@nhs.net This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR. The decision to award these contracts was made by LLR ICB's Strategic Commissioning Group on 23/1/24, which has delegated authority from the LLR ICB Board. The Contracting Authority has applied equal weighting to the key criteria. The Contracting Authority has assessed the provider's suitability and technical / professional ability to undertake this service based on their current activities and performance, against the key criteria and basic selection criteria when making a decision to award this contract. The provider's economic and financial standing has been considered in proportion to the contract value and terms. The assessment demonstrates that the provider has been, and is likely to continue to satisfy the requirements of the contract. The intention to award the contract is made on this basis. Conflicts of interest were identified among LLR ICB Strategic Commissioning Group (SCG), 23/01/2024. The non-conflicted members assessed the nature and risk of this conflict, and decided what steps to take to avoid and manage it. The ICB took the step to exclude the conflicted member from related discussions, and excluded the conflicted member from decision-making.