Provision of General Surgery Services (insourcing)

A Contract Award Notice
by SOMERSET NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Source
Find a Tender
Type
Contract (Services)
Duration
not specified
Value
£300K
Sector
HEALTH
Published
05 Mar 2024
Delivery
not specified
Deadline
n/a

Concepts

Location

Taunton

Geochart for 3 buyers and 1 suppliers

3 buyers

1 supplier

Description

The aim is to provide additional theatre capacity (and where required outpatient and endoscopy sessions for the General Surgeons) to manage waiting times for Acute Surgery.

Total Quantity or Scope

The aim is to provide additional theatre (and where required outpatient and endoscopy sessions for the General Surgeons) to manage waiting times for Acute Surgery.The Authority is intending to award the contract to an existing provider following the direct award process CThis is a call off contract and the maximum expected lifetime value of the contract is £300,000.00The contract dates are 01.04.24-31.03.26 with the option of 2 x 12 month extensions

Award Detail

1 Somerset Surgical Services (Gateshead)
  • Num offers: 1
  • Value: £300,000
  • Contractor is an SME.

Award Criteria

Existing provider is satisfying the original contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard 100.0

CPV Codes

  • 85111100 - Surgical hospital services

Indicators

  • Award on basis of price and quality.

Other Information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by midnight on 15 March 2024 via email to servicesteam.procurement@somersetft.nhs.uk. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.The decision makers were: Deputy Service Director – Surgery and Critical Care Group No conflicts of interest were declared among decision makers.The key criteria were weighted as follows:30% quality and Innovation30% Value15% Integration, Collaboration and Service Sustainability15% Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice10% Social valueQuality and value are the most important factors to ensure a high quality, safe and effective service can be provided to as many patients as possible to minimise waiting times.The rationale for choosing the provider with reference to the key criteria:The existing supplier is an established surgical services provider with a proven track record, and they are highly likely to be able to satisfy the new contract to a sufficient standard.

Reference

Domains