Citizens Advice Bureau - EUPD

A Contract Award Notice
by BERKSHIRE HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Source
Find a Tender
Type
Contract (Services)
Duration
not specified
Value
£55K
Sector
HEALTH
Published
18 Apr 2024
Delivery
not specified
Deadline
n/a

Concepts

Location

Bracknell

Geochart for 1 buyers and 1 suppliers

Description

Citizens Advice Bureau Wokingham - EUPD

Total Quantity or Scope

The contract Citizens Advice Bureau - EUPD supports young individuals with a personality disorder, providing non-medical support. It is the intention to award a contract to an existing provider following direct award process C under the Provider Selection Regime. It is a one year contract running 1/4/24 to 31/3/25 with a value of £55,000.00

Award Detail

1 Citizens Advice Wokingham (Wokingham)
  • Citizens Advice Bureau - EUPD
  • Reference: bhft 0542
  • Num offers: 1
  • Value: £55,000

Award Criteria

The existing provider is satisfying the original contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard 100.0
The existing provider is satisfying the original contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard 100.0

CPV Codes

  • 85312500 - Rehabilitation services

Indicators

  • Award on basis of price and quality.

Other Information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by 30th April 2024. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR. Any representations should be emailed to: tim.shannon@berkshire.nhs.uk The award decision was made by the Director of Finance. No conflicts of interest were identified. An assessment of the supplier was made looking at quality and innovation; value; integration, collaboration, and service sustainability; improving access, reducing health inequalities, and facilitating choice; social value, and basic selection criteria. It was assessed that the supplier had been doing a satisfactory job and was expected to continue to do a satisfactory job.

Reference

Domains