Sussex Home Visiting Service C283314

A Contract Award Notice
by NHS SUSSEX INTEGRATED CARE BOARD

Source
Find a Tender
Type
Contract (Services)
Duration
not specified
Value
£4M
Sector
HEALTH
Published
03 May 2024
Delivery
not specified
Deadline
n/a

Concepts

Location

NHS Sussex ICB area

Geochart for 3 buyers and 1 suppliers

3 buyers

1 supplier

Description

The service is a face-to-face option from 111; It is however only by exception. This means that it is for those patients who are: - unable to attend a face-to-face appointment e.g. end of life (EOL), - require all care in bed, house bound and shielding as per Public Health England guidelines or - who have been assessed by a clinician as appropriate for the service following an initial CAT 3 / 4 ambulance disposition. Patients that can travel to an alternative service are not eligible. This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be submitted to the relevant authority via the project (Atamis reference no. C283314) at https://health-family.force.com/s/Welcome by midnight (23:59) on 16/05/24. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR. This direct award is for a maximum period of 12 months, from 1/4/24 to 31/3/25. The service value is £4,067,269 per annum.

Award Detail

1 Ic24 (Ashford)
  • Num offers: 1
  • Value: £4,067,269

Renewal Options

In accordance with the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023.

Award Criteria

Quality criterion - Name: The existing provider is satisfying the original contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard 100.0
Value _

CPV Codes

  • 85100000 - Health services

Indicators

  • Options are available.
  • Award on basis of price and quality.

Other Information

C283314) at https://health-family.force.com/s/Welcome by midnight (23:59) on 16/03/24. … Decision maker: Executive Managing Director, Complex Commissioning, NHS Sussex ICB. No conflicts of interest were declared. The service evaluation was reviewed against the 5 key criteria: • Quality & Innovation • Value • Integration, collaboration & service sustainability • Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice • Social value These were then weighted as follows: Quality and innovation (30%), Value (20%), Integration, collaboration and service sustainability (20%), Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice (20%); Social Value (10%). In determining the weightings for each of the criteria, our primary focus was on ensuring that the evaluation process reflects the key priorities and objectives of the service. Quality & Innovation: This criterion was assigned the highest weighting, reflecting our commitment to delivering a service of the highest quality. It emphasises the importance of innovation and adaptability in meeting the evolving needs of service users while maintaining excellence in service delivery. Value: The criterion of "Value" holds significant importance as it underscores the necessity of achieving optimal value for public investment. It is essential to ensure that resources are utilised efficiently and effectively to deliver sustainable and cost-effective services. Integration, Collaboration, and Service Sustainability: This criterion shares the second heaviest weighting, highlighting the critical role of integration and collaboration in enhancing service delivery. It emphasises the importance of establishing cohesive partnerships between providers to ensure the sustainability and long-term viability of the service. Improving Access, Reducing Health Inequalities, and Facilitating Choice: Also assigned the second heaviest weighting, this criterion underscores our commitment to promoting equitable access to healthcare services. It emphasises the importance of addressing health inequalities and enhancing patient choice, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes for all. Social Value: While weighted the lightest among the criteria, "Social Value" remains a crucial consideration in our evaluation process. It recognises the potential impact of service changes on the local healthcare workforce and their contributions to broader social, economic, and environmental improvements in the community The existing provider was assessed against key criteria which were weighted according to importance in terms of service delivery and scored satisfactorily against the assessed criteria.

Reference

Domains