CBCT Teleradiology Reporting

A Contract Award Notice
by MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Source
Find a Tender
Type
Contract (Services)
Duration
not specified
Value
£60K
Sector
HEALTH
Published
12 Sep 2024
Delivery
not specified
Deadline
n/a

Concepts

Location

Trafford

Geochart for 2 buyers and 1 suppliers

2 buyers

1 supplier

Description

Provision of Teleradiology Services for CBCT patient scans

Total Quantity or Scope

‘This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 26th March 2024. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR'

Award Detail

1 Fusion Radiology (Luton)
  • Num offers: 1
  • Value: £60,000
  • Contractor is an SME.

Award Criteria

PRICE _

CPV Codes

  • 85150000 - Medical imaging services

Indicators

  • Award on basis of price.

Other Information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by 26th March 2024 This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.Written representations should be sent to Vincent Keenan- O'Connor , Directorate manager - Paediatric and Dental Radiology. The award decision makers were:Director of ImagingDirectorate Manager – Paediatric & Dental RadiologyConflict of interest declaration procedures followed, any decision makers who declared an interest were excluded (no interests declared in this instance) This contract was awarded under Direct Award Process C - MFT considers that the existing provider is satisfying the existing contract and will likely satisfy the proposed new contract. PCFT assessed the provider's service provision with respect to the basic selection criteria and the key decision making criteria as outlined in the PSR. Each of these criteria were assessed on a pass/fail basis by the award decision makers, and the existing provider passed each of the criteria.

Reference

Domains