SEL Housebound Annual Review Service for Patients with Long Term Conditions (LTCs)

A Contract Award Notice
by SOUTH EAST LONDON INTEGRATED CARE BOARD

Source
Find a Tender
Type
Contract (Services)
Duration
not specified
Value
£95K
Sector
HEALTH
Published
27 Mar 2025
Delivery
not specified
Deadline
n/a

Concepts

Location

London

Geochart for 2 buyers and 1 suppliers

Description

SEL Housebound Annual Review Service for Patients with Long Term Conditions (LTCs).

Total Quantity or Scope

SEL Housebound Annual Review Service for Patients with Long Term Conditions (LTCs) The current provider of the Service is meeting the contractual requirements to a satisfactory level and the intention is to award the providers the contract for the period 1st April 2025 to 31st March 2026, following PSR Direct Award Process C as there is no change to the contract terms. The approximate value of the contract for 12 months is £95,000.

Award Detail

1 One Health Lewisham (London)
  • Num offers: 1
  • Value: £95,000
  • Contractor is an SME.

Award Criteria

The existing provider is satisfying the original contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard 100.0
PRICE _

CPV Codes

  • 85100000 - Health services

Indicators

  • Award on basis of price.

Other Information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by midnight 8th April 2025. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR. Written representations should be sent to: hub.psrrepresentation@nhs.net Award decision makers: SMT Lewisham There were no conflict of interest identified in the decision making process. The criteria for evaluation was Pass/Fail and had the following scores: - Quality and Innovation: Pass - Value for Money: Pass - Integration, Collaboration, and Service Sustainability: Pass - Improving Access, Reducing Health Inequalities, and Facilitating Choice: Pass - Social Value: Pass The criteria were applied with their respective Pass/Fail criteria as specified. Current Performance: Overall Pass achieved Potential Future Performance: Overall Pass achieved

Reference

Domains